data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/80868/80868618c885a785b7abcf8123640f168c991c6f" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b5f4c/b5f4c07a95839154a61596ff960b3c1f6f1636bd" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/15632/15632ff7737a499f81e8bd08e4dfb52dff59c91b" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/432ad/432adb83b0e162294cf6e99fea5bc6fef28e20e7" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dc3a2/dc3a222cceab5ec1acf64fab30d1431299ad8c04" alt=""
He perfectly addresses something I've been pondering lately. I adore non-objective, textural works. I do. I ADORE them. However, I've never been good at painting them. My painting fingertips NEED a human figure in order to be happy. BUT, in my love of contemporary interior design, I'm always keen to decorate with a non-objective piece. A realistic piece somehow doesn't look at good in my fave mode of house design. HOWEVER Nathan's works are the rare balance between the two worlds, I think. If I were rich, I'd fill my mansion with his works. It'd be a crazy wonderhouse of uberdesign!
No comments:
Post a Comment